Rapid Insert Molding Leads to Lower Production Costs
Government contractor Harris Corporation lauds insert molding’s benefits
Testing circuit boards is a critical process at Harris Corporation, a leading government, defense, and commercial contractor specializing in communication, space and intelligence, and electronic systems. That testing now is faster and less expensive, earning recognition from the company’s own Business Excellence Program—all with help from Protolabs’ insert molding process.
Based in Melbourne, Fla., Harris describes its vast offerings as reaching “from ocean to orbit and everywhere in between.” Harris’ product and service lineup includes tactical communications, air traffic management, and satellite payload solutions. Founded in 1895, Harris currently has $6 billion in annual revenue, more than 10,000 employees, and customers in more than 100 countries.
During qualification testing, circuit boards go through steps including several hours running on a vibration test bed, something like “a paint shaker on steroids,” according to Michael Murray, principal mechanical engineer in Specialty Applications at Harris. “We want to run them through a battery of tests to ensure that we have high-quality manufacturing of our boards,” Murray said.
Development Challenge: A Pressing Concern
Finding the best way to secure the circuit boards to a large metal plate on the vibration tester became a recurring issue, Murray said.
Machining the plate and attaching the circuit boards directly to the plates was costly and the machined attachment points didn’t necessarily align with those on different boards used in subsequent testing.
Murray then developed plastic test fixtures that could hold a number of boards and bolting the fixtures onto the vibration tester. He enlisted Protolabs’ rapid injection molding service to make the fixtures, which are customizable to the varying geometry of different boards. (The fixtures are made of Cycoloy, a PC/ABS resin that Murray said Harris uses in some product enclosures and that he said he likes for its aesthetics and mechanical and thermal performance.)
Attaching circuit boards to the plastic fixtures—with screws from 1 to about 2 millimeters in diameter, with corresponding nuts—proved tedious and time-consuming, Murray said. Adding threaded brass inserts into the bosses on the test fixtures helped somewhat, enabling technicians to use screws alone to secure each board.
But that required a slow, secondary step of installing each insert manually with a thermal press at Harris’ facility, in a process known as heat staking. For a test run of 100 circuit boards, Murray said, that meant first installing 500 small inserts—one at a time, all by hand. And that was before getting out the screwdrivers to fasten the circuit boards to the test fixtures.
“The process is labor intensive,” Murray said. “It uses small screws, small inserts, and you kind of have to use tweezers to set them in place. It can become tedious after doing it for many hours.” The painstaking work could take technicians several days to complete, he said. As fatigue mounted, “sanity breaks” sometimes were in order.
Manufacturing Solution: Insert Molding to the Rescue
With Harris as a Protolabs’ early adoption partner, Murray was eager to be among the first to try Protolabs’ new rapid insert molding service, which the company added last year in response to customer requests.
Insert molding involves placing a preformed component—typically a metal part—into a mold and then injecting thermoplastic into the mold to form the finished part. The metal reinforces the mechanical properties of the plastic. Insert molding also eliminates the need for a secondary process such as heat staking or ultrasonic welding to install the insert into an as-molded part.
In Harris’ case, Protolabs’ insert molding enabled Murray to have all of the brass inserts molded into the test fixtures—20 inserts into each of dozens of 6-by-6-inch fixtures—in one step before he received them. That freed technicians from using the hand-operated thermal press to place each insert individually.
“Obviously, having the inserts molded in the part from the get-go was a huge advantage to us because the parts are ready to go out of the box,” Murray said.
Another advantage, Murray said, is getting insert-molded parts within 15 days, positioning Protolabs as an on-demand manufacturer that can meet his aggressive timetable. A traditional molder, in contrast, typically would need two to three months to deliver insert molded parts.
Adapting the design of the plastic test fixtures for insert molding required only minor tweaks, Murray said. He based the changes on feedback from Protolabs’ design for manufacturability (DFM) analysis and a conversation with a Protolabs engineer.
Product Outcome: Insert Molding Saves Time, Money
From a total cost of ownership perspective, the labor savings Harris realizes from insert molding the plastic fixtures more than offsets the slightly higher cost of the parts and tooling, Murray said. Having molded-in inserts saves two or more full days of labor by eliminating the process of manually installing the inserts in the test fixtures.
“The net was definitely savings compared to our labor cost,” Murray said. “It was more efficient in our testing as well. I’m able to get started sooner. My technicians definitely are happy.”
Harris validated Murray’s findings, recognizing the switch to insert molding in its Harris Business Excellence (HBX) program, which he said emphasizes continuous improvement and eliminating wasteful practices.
“[The switch to rapid insert molding] was identified and recognized as a cost and time savings that ultimately will carry forward on future stuff we do,” Murray said. “Another engineer who sees that might also be willing to try (insert molding).”
For his part, Murray will continue to use insert molding for test fixtures, prototyping, and low-volume production of final products. “In some cases, the features that I’m using to mount the circuit board on this fixture are nearly identical to the features that are used in the final enclosure,” Murray said. “So it’s also a way to test out and prove our design at the board level.”
Murray admitted to pushing the limits of Protolabs’ design and tooling rules as a frequent customer over the past 13 years, including the last eight at Harris.
“We try to design things that Protolabs may not have done before,” Murray said. “Obviously they’re listening to their customers’ needs and trying to improve their processes to adapt to meeting those needs.”